Opposing determinants of compliance and interrogative suggestibility

James Baxter; Stella Bain; Andrew Pringle; Holly Fowler; Tedis  Tafili

doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.004

Opposing determinants of compliance and interrogative suggestibility

James Baxter, Stella Bain, Andrew Pringle, Holly Fowler, Tedis Tafili

Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1 & 2) can illustrate why interviewees yield to pressure from interrogators. Variations of the GSS procedure can help isolate individual factors contributing to interrogative suggestibility. Induced malingering is one variation, instructing participants to ‘fake bad’ on the GSS. The present study used this method in an attempt to reconcile the conflicting findings of previous malingering studies.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	918-924
Number of pages	7
Journal	Personality and Individual Differences
Volume	54
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.004
Publication status	Published - Jun 2013

Keywords

interrogative suggestibility
expectancy
trust
compliance

Access to Document

10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.004

Cite this

@article{8f5b1acf414e456e90359f4f04517838,

title = "Opposing determinants of compliance and interrogative suggestibility",

abstract = "The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1 & 2) can illustrate why interviewees yield to pressure from interrogators. Variations of the GSS procedure can help isolate individual factors contributing to interrogative suggestibility. Induced malingering is one variation, instructing participants to {\textquoteleft}fake bad{\textquoteright} on the GSS. The present study used this method in an attempt to reconcile the conflicting findings of previous malingering studies. ",

keywords = "interrogative suggestibility, expectancy, trust, compliance",

author = "James Baxter and Stella Bain and Andrew Pringle and Holly Fowler and Tedis Tafili",

year = "2013",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.004",

language = "English",

volume = "54",

pages = "918--924",

journal = "Personality and Individual Differences",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Opposing determinants of compliance and interrogative suggestibility

AU - Baxter, James

AU - Bain, Stella

AU - Pringle, Andrew

AU - Fowler, Holly

AU - Tafili, Tedis

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1 & 2) can illustrate why interviewees yield to pressure from interrogators. Variations of the GSS procedure can help isolate individual factors contributing to interrogative suggestibility. Induced malingering is one variation, instructing participants to ‘fake bad’ on the GSS. The present study used this method in an attempt to reconcile the conflicting findings of previous malingering studies.

AB - The Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1 & 2) can illustrate why interviewees yield to pressure from interrogators. Variations of the GSS procedure can help isolate individual factors contributing to interrogative suggestibility. Induced malingering is one variation, instructing participants to ‘fake bad’ on the GSS. The present study used this method in an attempt to reconcile the conflicting findings of previous malingering studies.

KW - interrogative suggestibility

KW - expectancy

KW - trust

KW - compliance

U2 - 10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.004

DO - 10.1016/j.paid.2013.01.004

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 918

EP - 924

JO - Personality and Individual Differences

JF - Personality and Individual Differences

IS - 8

ER -

Opposing determinants of compliance and interrogative suggestibility

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this