Abstract
There is no doubt that the proposal to establish market-based control mechanisms for patient safety is both interesting and intriguing. However, I am not optimistic that Coiera and Braithwaite’s (C&B’s) proposal (see page 99 ) will see the light of day 1. My objections are based on three fundamental flaws that I see in the foundation for this proposal: first, as an economist, I question whether “safety” can be considered a public good in the same way that the environment might; second, I am not convinced that emissions trading has worked sufficiently well to justify basing a safety strategy on such an approach; and, finally, I propose that our healthcare systems have not been particularly effective in managing resources or priority setting, and I make an economist’s attempt at addressing opportunities that still exist in this domain.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 87-88 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Quality and Safety in Health Care |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2009 |
Keywords
- patient safety
- health economics